Capabilities

The right test, correctly powered, honestly read.

Sensory science only compounds in value when it is consistent — across plants, panels and years. Every engagement starts with one question: what decision are you trying to make?

DESCRIPTIVE PANEL · SESSION 3Coded tasting cups and spoons laid out for evaluation
Coded cups, randomized serving order
Quality assurance

Consistency across lots, lines and plants.

Batch & plant comparison

Different plants, panels and regions produce non-comparable data unless the program itself is engineered. We build the protocol — sample handling, coding, presentation, panel calibration — so a lot from Ontario and a lot from Brazil can sit in the same analysis. Then we run the test that matches your risk: a tetrad when you need power, a duo-trio when a reference is natural, descriptive analysis when you need to know which attribute moved.

Tetrad · duo-trio · descriptive analysis · universal SOPs across sites

Sensory shelf life

Traditional cutoffs treat consumer rejection as a fixed threshold. It is a distribution. A probabilistic technique — presented at the 10th Pangborn Symposium and implemented in North American meat plants — gives you the day at which a chosen share of consumers reject, with its confidence band.

Sensory shelf life · consumers still accepting

Probabilistic estimate with 95% band, refrigerated storage
Illustrative output
100%7550250 0204060 days Day 38 · 50% rejection 50% rejection · day 38 95% band · days 33–44

Read: A “best by” at day 45 would put half your consumers past their rejection point a week early. Day 35 holds 60% acceptance with margin.

Research & development

Formulation decisions with a number behind them.

Reformulation & cost-out

Supplier changes, ingredient substitutions and cost reductions tested against the current product. A consumer product-matching protocol developed for highly variable systems such as meats — where lot-to-lot noise swamps naive tests — delivered $1 million in savings.

Formulation optimization

How much cheese and how much bacon maximizes liking in a stuffed burger? Too little and the product is unremarkable; too much and cost, structure and appeal all suffer. Response surface methodology treats it as the designed-experiment problem it is — the approach behind a U.S. patent.

Difficult populations

Adult scales don’t transfer to children. With the Kansas State University Sensory and Consumer Research Center, a validated technique for measuring school-aged children’s acceptance of reduced-sodium foods.

LINE 2 · SAMPLE PULLOperator on a food production line
Same product, second plant: the question is whether anyone can tell
Consumer insight

What consumers accept, prefer and believe.

CLT · SESSION 2 OF 6Two evaluators scoring beverage samples at a table
Central location test, 10–15 participants per session

Acceptance & competitive benchmarking

Central location and home-use tests with liking, purchase intent and attribute diagnostics — against your current product, the category leader, or both. Read for significance where it matters, segmented where preferences split, and delivered in consumer language where that helps R&D.

Concept, packaging & claims

Concepts — does the idea land before you invest in formulation? Packaging — shelf standout, comprehension, appeal. Health claims — which are believed, which quietly damage trust. Pricing perception. Max-diff and TURF where you need to choose among many options: at St. Jude that meant 140 tested message options from one study.

CLT · HUT · max-diff · TURF · preference segmentation · Jobs-to-be-Done

Not sure which test? That is the first conversation.

Discuss a study →